Friday, May 1, 2009
The Lobby wants War with Iran!
The Israel lobby has been running into a few problems lately, but it’s nothing they don’t think they can handle: a charge of treason, a strong suspicion of obstructing justice, and a gathering storm of criticism from a few dissident intellectuals and policy types. Nothing to get too exercised about.read the rest ...
Saturday, April 4, 2009
Israel-Iran Range Study
Here is a link to an interesting discussion on the study done by Abdullah Toukan and Anthony H. Cordesman on a possible Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear development facilities.
Quoting a commenter from that blog entry:
Quoting a commenter from that blog entry:
An unprovoked unclear first strike? America and allies may have been able to get away with attacking Iraq on unfounded suspicions of WMDs but it had a number of factors in its favour. Firstly Saddam was a first order tyrant, secondly it was a conventional attack and thirdly - and of much greater importance - the US was too powerful to be held to account for its actions anyway.
Toukan & Cordesman mentioned the widely perceived application of double standards which some of the EU states have been abetting despite internal public opinion. While the US has been able to cover for Israel with SC vetoes etc. I doubt any country would even attempt to justify such a crime, apart [from] Israel and the US. If the US tried to claim justification or were shown in anyway to have had foreknowledge and failed to warn or try and prevent the attack I suspect they would find they had less friends than North Korea. - Link
Monday, March 16, 2009
Iranian reformers unite; seek ouster of Ahmadinejad
Ahmadinejad may be losing support. Is it a new day for Iran?
Mohammad Khatami, the reformist former president, has decided to withdraw from the June presidential race to support a political ally “The most important goal is to prevent Mr. Ahmadinejad from re-election, not to get Mr. Khatami elected,”
|
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Why bombing Iran won't work
And some things that just might ...
"You can't bomb knowledge," said Robert Litwak, Director of the Division of International Security Studies at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars [...] [B]ombing ... Iran's nuclear sites will not deter future technological developments [...] US military action ... would only trigger major responses worldwide, ... a worsening of the fragile state of Iraq and "a rally around the flag effect in Iran." Pres. Obama and other political figures have not recognized the need to use sensitive language when dealing with Iran. Iran has expressed its disdain for phrases such as "carrots and sticks," that the US has repeatedly used [...] [T]his mistranslates to say that the US plans to deal with Iran as a donkey, either reward it with carrots or |
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Iran Nuke News is 86% US Media Hype
Iran does not have the capability of enriching uranium to sufficient levels to become bomb-grade. Yes, it's enriched, but to only about 1/20th of the quality needed.
|
Saturday, February 14, 2009
Any hints on Mossad-Madoff allaiance?
Please drop a line.
Facts are appreciated, but musings are also accepted (please specifically state "hypothetical").
Facts are appreciated, but musings are also accepted (please specifically state "hypothetical").
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)