Checkout these headlines!
Bomb Iran LA Times (last year)
We must Bomb Iran, says US republican guru The Telegraph, UK
Bomb, Bomb Iran New York timesPodhoretz secretly urged Bush to Bomb Iran Politco
Likud members: Bomb Iran Ynet News
Bomb Iran? U.S. Requests Bunker-Buster Bombs ABC news
We may have to Bomb Iran Times (last year)
The Case for Bombing Iran, I hope and pray that President Bush will do it. Wall Street Journal
Bolton Calls for Bombing Iran The Guardian
We must attack Iran before it gets the bomb The Telegraph, UK
US plans to Bomb Iran, inspite denials The Independent
The Plane that will Bomb Iran The Atlantic
Bomb Iran Now Jewcy.com
US planning contingency plan to Bomb Iran Reuters
Bomb Iran: For Israel and America!CounterPunch
(originally posted at http://iranfacts.blogspot.com)
3 comments:
I'm not sure whether to hold the colloquy in the comments or to start another blog post as a response.
I stipulate that there are nut-sites galore on the Internet where people advocate all sorts of wacky political and sexual positions. How much does it reflect on actual U.S. citizens? How many of them are influenced by these "fringe" sources?
I don't pretend to know. But I drive on American roads every day and I know that it only takes one woman putting on her makeup in the mirror to cause a major pile up.
Who is driving the American dialog? How important are these Likudnik voices? Does anyone take them seriously?
I need the answer by C.O.B. today or you're fired!
:P
Well Servant, I have the reference to all these bomb-calls: NYT, Guardian, WSJ, ... not quite nut-sites in common opinion.
(these are well respected, expensively paied nutcases though)
But to answer oen of your Q's
Who is driving the American dialog? How important are these Likudnik voices? Does anyone take them seriously?
It is not about "people" taking them serious. They are holding the Congress! They are the supporters of Hillary Clinton! They are those who go against Leahy's opposition to installing a torture-loving attorney general!
These nutcase likudniks are what we call the "cup that's warmer than the soup." I doubt if they evern care about the interests of Israelis. They are wealthy, and they pay your politician's way into the office. And employ a large number of people in their factories of various kind.
"Definition of terrorism:Terrorism in the modern sense is violence or other harmful acts committed (or threatened) against civilians for political or other ideological goals..."
We have yet to admit that Hiroshima and Nagasaki fit the definition, let alone the firebombings of Germany and Japan. It is, unfortunately, an American tradition.
Post a Comment